An Interview with M.D. Dixon, author of IKONA.

Four people standing together
IKONA

Book Description

A fluid medium where the past and future frequently intersect through a mysterious icon is presented in M.D. Dixon’s IKONA. The narrative follows four individuals who are drawn toward an ancient healing cross, leading them on a journey of inner reckoning and collective discovery. It is an observational look at how the choices of the few can resonate across multiple dimensions of existence.

Across various cities and fractured timelines, a mysterious Russian Orthodox cross with inexplicable healing power begins to emerge. Four strangers find themselves drawn into its resonance—from the busy streets of Sydney, Hong Kong, Atlanta, and Berlin to the stark quiet of a post-apocalyptic Siberian tundra. Kate Davies witnesses the icon’s power in Atlanta, while in Sydney, Finley Minor deals with the weight of prophetic visions. Jia Li MacPherson, a former thief, holds secrets that powerful forces are willing to kill for. One hundred years in the future, Wallace Deng Moroz, a monk in a world ravaged by a genetic engineering catastrophe, clings to visions of a cure.

In a dangerously polarized world, the convergence of these four heroes feels destined, yet it is ultimately shaped by their own decisions. As they move further into the cross’s field, they must decide which version of the future they will inhabit and what price they must pay to reach it.

 

Q&A

What’s a detail, theme, or clue in your book that most readers might miss on the first read—but you secretly hope someone notices?

I hope someone notices that whilst the present-day chapters and future chapters are chronologically ordered forward in time, the chapters set in the past (early 20th century Siberia) move backwards in time, so that the earliest chapter timeline-wise for the past chapters reaches a climax at the latest period time-wise for the other chapters. Truthfully, there are many other details that might be missed but which astute readers will catch: recurring motifs, the recursive nature of the story, how Gutov’s chapter 26 is also IKONA’s chapter 26, for example.

When did this story or idea “click” into place for you—was there a single moment you knew you had to write it? 

This story first came to me in 2012. I planned the structure and journeys for years before I sat down to write it. I knew from the moment I got the first few pages and the title that it would be my most mature work. It is my fourth novel, but my first published novel. It was a persistent inner voice which never left me no matter how many twists and turns my life took in the interim. I wrote it in 2022.

Which character or real-life person surprised you the most while writing this book, and why?

Finley Minor’s journey evolved in a way I didn’t expect. No spoilers so I will just say that his arc deeply moved me, and I was unprepared for my own emotional reaction.

If your book had a soundtrack, what three songs would be on it and what scenes or moments would they pair with? 

Jimi Hendrix’s All Along the Watchtower was a song that appeared in my mind the moment the title and first chapter appeared, as if guiding me with its revolutionary message – I feel that this song is the musical equivalent of IKONA’s message.

The song You Are a Memory by Message to Bears accompanied Part Three of the novel and always brings me back, emotionally, to Finley’s and Wallace’s final chapters.

Saeglopur by Sigur Ros takes me to the narrative’s climax and particularly Jia Li during one of her Shibari performances.

Music was a salve for the entire writing of IKONA and I created a public Spotify playlist for the novel called IKONA the Playlist.

https://open.spotify.com/playlist/7BbP05jUU3tJm28IfEy4E6?si=w4HVUAmGRui8WkflIg7AYw&pi=VOEyJ7igQqOg0

What’s one belief, question, or emotional truth you hope readers carry with them long after they finish your book? 

Hope. I want readers to experience hope and a sense of personal agency in the long road of societal change we currently find ourselves navigating.

Tell us about a moment during the writing process when the story (or message) took an unexpected turn. 

Honestly, writing this felt like an experience of transmission. There was no unexpected turn – the consistency in message, tone and narrative arc was set and unwavering. There was always a sense of consistency, as if the river of words flowed, and I was merely the faithful witness. From a craft point of view, there was a fair bit of planning. It felt like a giant puzzle I had to arrange in precisely the correct order. Like sacred geometry. Which chapters went where, and in what order, and so on. But the narrative itself flowed without deviation.

If your protagonist (or the central figure in your nonfiction) could give the reader one piece of advice, what would it be? 

Well, as my character Gutov says regarding his chapter the Bridge, “Read it again, this time with your heart.”

What real-world place, object, or memory helped shape a key element in your book? 

I am a Russophile by training, albeit 30 years ago. I lived in St. Petersburg, did my doctoral research in Crimea, travelled a lot in Russia and Ukraine…

My experience speaking Russian with friends, speaking of the soul, of life, of destiny, on -35 degree nights in friends’ apartments, with vodka or strong coffee, has certainly shaped me, and by extension, my vision and prose. This was in the 1990s, a time of that society’s collapse – the atmosphere and weight of it permeates my marrow. So this definitely has shaped a certain ‘vibe’ of IKONA.

What’s something you had to research, learn, or experience to write this book that genuinely shocked you?

I can’t speak to shock; I don’t think anything shocked me! But I did a deep dive on the process of creating a metal crucifix –the how tos – and this led me to researching the life of iconographers in early 20th century Russia, and that was fascinating. I found a wonderful academic book on the subject matter with loads of photos, and it just really touched me. Iconographers were like monks, and lived as such and were part of the monastic community.  I loved how when they created icons, it was a holy occasion accompanied by fasting and prayer.

SPOILER ALERT: I was surprised (and also not surprised as I know Russians and Russian history) that one of the chief investigators of the Tunguska Event was a famous (at the time) science fantasy author. The government actually invited this person to research and comment, because conventional science had found no answers, but they thought this author had some kind of insight into the field of reality beyond hard science. It always makes me chuckle when I remember this.

If your book were invited to join a shelf with three other titles, which ones would make you happiest—and what would that shelf say about your story? 

I would place it alongside Cloud Atlas by David Mitchell, The Teachings of Don Juan by Carlos Castaneda, and The Overstory by Richard Powers. I think because it signals to the reader that while the story is a high-concept, multi-timeline puzzle, it is grounded in the visceral, feet-on-the-ground reality of a spiritual initiation. This shelf tells the reader that IKONA is an invitation to look beyond the shadows of our current reality and contemplate how consciousness itself can heal the future.

 

M.D. Dixon is a novelist, somatic therapist, and explorer of the intersections between the psyche and the sacred, science and mysticism, trauma and transformation. Holding a Ph.D. in the social sciences with a focus on Russia and Ukraine, Dixon has spent nearly fifteen years in therapeutic practice in Sydney, Australia. Dixon’s debut novel, IKONA, weaves visionary fiction, myth, and metaphysics to illuminate the evolution of consciousness. Dixon also hosts The Shattering Place, a podcast on multidimensional healing and the awakening human story, launching in early 2026.

Visit M.D. Dixon online.

Amazon: https://bit.ly/3ZdHSXy

Goodreads: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/243253546-ikona

© 2025- Ronovan Hester Copyright reserved. The author asserts his moral and legal rights over this work.

10 Questions with Keith McWalter, author of Lifers.

Electric with compelling action and trenchant social commentary and perfect for fans of Nikki Erlick’s The Measure, this genre-straddling work of speculative fiction examines ageism from a new and challenging perspective.

In the year 2050, the man known as Zinn is on the run from the consequences of his greatest creation: an artificial genome that wildly increases the human lifespan. His “Methuselah gene” has gone viral, and he’s being hunted by Adele, a semi-retired CIA biowarfare specialist who hopes to find a way to reverse the genome’s effects before it’s too late.

As the longevity plague spreads, populations explode, economies are upended, and intergenerational resentments boil over. Adele searches for a cure while her former lover, Dan Altman, and his wife, Marion, wealthy political operatives both, become leaders of a movement of hundred-plus-year-old “lifers” and fight to create a sanctuary for the ultra-aged in the wilds of Colorado. Meanwhile, the Altmans’ son, Nolan, thinks he has the answer to the longevity crisis: a suicide pill that kills after one year, a death wish algorithm that will influence the super-aged to take it, and his beautiful daughter, Claire, who is a spokesperson for the growing anti-lifer backlash and the head of the federal government’s new Department for Longevity Management.

Combining a hugely topical premise with a vein of social-political satire, Lifers evokes a world where society’s ingrained ageism turns lethal and the fear of death is replaced by the challenge of living on . . . and on.

Lifers Cover
Lifers

If Ann Patchett wrote sci-fi, this is what it might look like. What does it mean to live forever? To you? To your loved ones? To your country? To the world? A great read with a thought-provoking premise, and a sure-fire conversation starter for that dinner party you’re dreading.

-Arlene Dillon, journalist and former President of the White House Correspondents’ Association

You can get Lifers at Amazon.

You have only a brief moment to tell someone about your book. Can you tell us, in two sentences or less, what Lifers is about and and make us want to read it?

When a rogue scientist’s longevity gene goes viral, the boomer generation suddenly stops dying, and a multigenerational family must confront the personal, social, and political consequences of potential immortality.

Lifers blends grounded science with near-future imaginings to examine ageism and the quest for longevity in a startling new light.

Why did you need to write this story?

Like so many of us, I’m attracted to the idea of living a long and healthy life, so I’ve read fairly widely in nonfiction accounts of longevity science and its practical applications.

Two things struck me about most discussions of longevity enhancement: increased longevity tends to be viewed as a luxury product for the rich and the few; and no one discusses the economic and social stresses that a radically longer (even if healthy) lifespan would impose on individuals, on families, and on society at large.

I wrote Lifers to dramatize those unspoken implications, and to examine ageism from a different perspective in which extreme longevity becomes commonplace and there are so many super-aged individuals that they become a problem — and a force — that must be reckoned with.

Why did you choose strong females as the protagonists who move the plot of the story?

For whatever reason, perhaps having to do with the influence of my super-competent mother and my independently-minded spouse, I find that writing from a female point of view comes easily. The challenge, of course, is not to presume too much understanding of women’s unique experience, and to maintain a stance of humble empathy as a writer.

The women protagonists in Lifers are of different generations, and I wanted to use female relationships to illustrate both how conflicts happen across generational lines, and how those conflicts can be resolved through uniquely female skills.

There are multiple settings/locations in Lifers, what research did you do to create that world for the reader to immerse into?

I’m fortunate to have traveled broadly and lived in multiple urban settings, so the locations in Lifers are all drawn from real places that I know well and love, and I had to do very little research about them.

With limited resources on the planet, what would be the solutions to the problems extended life would bring and just how far do we go?

Lifers is an attempt to imagine answers to this very question, but in the novel longevity accelerates very suddenly, and I can only hope that in real life we’d have more time to adapt to the challenges of having billions more humans on the planet, and millions more people in their second century of living. Overpopulation and strains on the medical system would be the most pressing problems, with the effects cascading into personal and national finances. Economies would have to find ways of putting able-bodied super-centenarians back to productive work, and housing would have to become much more communal and less age-stratified. At some point options for living off-earth (some of which are depicted in the book) would hopefully become available. This all assumes that government remains democratic and rational, and doesn’t descend into even worse divisiveness than we’re witnessing today.

What will connect the reader to the story and make them want to keep reading the story?

The characters. No matter how interesting the premise — and I think the premise in Lifers is very compelling — it’s the connection to the characters that keeps a reader engaged. I’m proud of the cast of characters in the book, and think they’re varied and sympathetic — and realistic — enough to pull the reader along to find out what happens to each of them.

How long did it take to complete Lifers?

About a year and a half.

You’ve said you would be a ‘Lifer’, a long-lived person if you had the choice. What would you do with that time?

I would write and travel, and perhaps work on a second career in politics, to try to bring some rationality back into our civil discourse.

Did you have difficulty deciding your book was ready to publish?

Not really, though “ready” is a relative term, and there were many, many revisions. Probably 90% of my editing occurs while writing. The most significant form of revision for me is, once all or most of the book is finished, to review the scene sequence to try to improve it to make sure the reader is drawn forward in the narrative at the right pace, and that characters have been fleshed out enough. On Lifers I ended up adding quite a few chapters and scenes. But in a sense no book is ever really finished. There are still things I would change or add to it.

What is your next project idea?

I’m beginning to think about a sequel to Lifers that would take off from the book’s conclusion, where a very specific form of time travel — actually, collective memory travel — becomes possible. I want to depart from the current fabulistic trend where time travel just “is” — it’s an unexamined premise, not a plausible process (I’m thinking of The Ministry of Time and Sea of Tranquility). The whole trope of time travel has become a rather tedious cliché and needs some new life injected into it. So that’s my next mission: make time travel believable again.

You can get Lifers at Amazon.

 

Keith McWalter
Keith McWalter

Author Bio:

Keith McWalter’s first novel, When We Were All Still Alive, was published in 2021. His essays have appeared in The New York Times, The New York Times Magazine, and the San Francisco Chronicle. He’s the author of two blogs, Mortal Coil and Spoiled Guest, which present his essays and travel pieces to a loyal online following. A collection of his essays, No One Else Will Tell You: Letters from a Bi-Coastal Father, won a Writer’s Digest Award for nonfiction.

Keith is a graduate of Columbia Law School and earned a BA in English Literature from Denison University. He lives with his wife, Courtney, in Granville, Ohio, and Sanibel, Florida.

Find out more: https://keithmcwalterwrites.com/

Facebook: @keith.mcwalter

Twitter: @kgmcwalter

Instagram: @kmcwalter

© 2014-2024- Ronovan Hester Copyright reserved. The author asserts his moral and legal rights over this work.